Quadro P2200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6
24.83
+3.1%

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Quadro P2200 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200210
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data32.23
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (2 years ago)10 June 2019 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$409

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481280
Core clock speed1238 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data119.4

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro P2200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz10008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data200.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
1440p44
+10%
40−45
−10%
4K26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 66
+10%
60−65
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Battlefield 5 93
+3.3%
90−95
−3.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Far Cry 5 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hitman 3 102
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 66
+10%
60−65
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 89
+4.7%
85−90
−4.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Far Cry 5 64
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 77
+10%
70−75
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hitman 3 71
+9.2%
65−70
−9.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+8%
75−80
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 83
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Hitman 3 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42
+5%
40−45
−5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hitman 3 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 6.7% faster than Quadro P2200 in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 10% faster than Quadro P2200 in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 8.3% faster than Quadro P2200 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 24.83 24.08
Recency 11 May 2021 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro P2200.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 873 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 306 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.