Quadro M5000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.96
+2.7%

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms Quadro M5000 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking200210
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.13
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)29 June 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,856.99
Current priceno data$823 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed1238 MHz861 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1038 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.9
Floating-point performanceno data4,252 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro M5000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2" (5.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6256 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz6612 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 211 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)no data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212
Shader Modelno data5
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data+
CUDAno data5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
1440p44
+10%
40−45
−10%
4K27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 66
+10%
60−65
−10%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Hitman 3 102
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 126
+5%
120−130
−5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+8.8%
80−85
−8.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 118
+7.3%
110−120
−7.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 66
+10%
60−65
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Far Cry 5 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Hitman 3 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
+5.3%
95−100
−5.3%
Metro Exodus 77
+10%
70−75
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+6.7%
75−80
−6.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 77
+10%
70−75
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+8%
75−80
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+5.3%
75−80
−5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Metro Exodus 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%
Hitman 3 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 49
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+12%
50−55
−12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Hitman 3 15
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 35
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro M5000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.96 24.30
Recency 11 May 2021 29 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 150 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro M5000.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro M5000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 908 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 56 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.