Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Place in performance ranking	33	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	43.73	24.01
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Turing TU102	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2018 (5 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$999
Current price	$297 (0.3x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2080 Ti has 82% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	3072
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	270 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.2	499.2

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	352 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	616.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.26
+5.2%

PRO W7700 53.49

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2080 Ti 21784
+5.2%

PRO W7700 20710

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms Radeon PRO W7700 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 +10%	150−160 −10%
1440p	120 +9.1%	110−120 −9.1%
4K	90 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−110
+7%

100−105

−7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	125 +13.6%	110−120 −13.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	107 +7%	100−105 −7%
Battlefield 5	170 +6.3%	160−170 −6.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	150−160 +7.9%	140−150 −7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
Far Cry 5	136 +13.3%	120−130 −13.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 +10%	100−105 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	182 +7.1%	170−180 −7.1%
Hitman 3	171 +6.9%	160−170 −6.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	146 +12.3%	130−140 −12.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +8.2%	110−120 −8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	144 +10.8%	130−140 −10.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	111 +11%	100−105 −11%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	108 +8%	100−105 −8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 +7.1%	85−90 −7.1%
Battlefield 5	164 +9.3%	150−160 −9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	81 +8%	75−80 −8%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
Far Cry 5	130 +8.3%	120−130 −8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	106 +6%	100−105 −6%
Forza Horizon 4	181 +6.5%	170−180 −6.5%
Hitman 3	163 +8.7%	150−160 −8.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	124 +12.7%	110−120 −12.7%
Metro Exodus	107 +7%	100−105 −7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	139 +6.9%	130−140 −6.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	247 +7.4%	230−240 −7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	99 +10%	90−95 −10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	82 +9.3%	75−80 −9.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +6.7%	75−80 −6.7%
Battlefield 5	159 +6%	150−160 −6%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +7%	100−105 −7%
Far Cry 5	122 +10.9%	110−120 −10.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	96 +6.7%	90−95 −6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	168 +12%	150−160 −12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 +12.5%	120−130 −12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90 +5.9%	85−90 −5.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	127 +5.8%	120−130 −5.8%
Hitman 3	147 +13.1%	130−140 −13.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	94 +10.6%	85−90 −10.6%
Metro Exodus	76 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +14.5%	55−60 −14.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110 +10%	100−105 −10%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	72 +10.8%	65−70 −10.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	67 +11.7%	60−65 −11.7%
Battlefield 5	134 +11.7%	120−130 −11.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +8%	50−55 −8%
Far Cry 5	117 +6.4%	110−120 −6.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%
Forza Horizon 4	147 +13.1%	130−140 −13.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +5.6%	90−95 −5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	73 +12.3%	65−70 −12.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	77 +10%	70−75 −10%
Hitman 3	85 +6.3%	80−85 −6.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27 +12.5%	24−27 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	51 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +20%	35−40 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	61 +10.9%	55−60 −10.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +8.9%	90−95 −8.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 +11.1%	45−50 −11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	46 +15%	40−45 −15%
Battlefield 5	86 +7.5%	80−85 −7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +19%	21−24 −19%
Far Cry 5	78 +11.4%	70−75 −11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	77 +10%	70−75 −10%
Forza Horizon 4	107 +7%	100−105 −7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	44 +10%	40−45 −10%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Ti is 10% faster than PRO W7700 in 1080p
RTX 2080 Ti is 9.1% faster than PRO W7700 in 1440p
RTX 2080 Ti is 5.9% faster than PRO W7700 in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	56.26	53.49
Recency	27 August 2018	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	270 Watt	190 Watt