Radeon PRO W7700 vs TITAN RTX

Place in performance ranking	56	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	11.33	24.84
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	TU102	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 December 2018 (5 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,499	$999
Current price	$1035 (0.4x MSRP)	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 119% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	3072
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	18,600 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.83

PRO W7700 51.83
+6.1%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms TITAN RTX by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN RTX 18858

PRO W7700 20016
+6.1%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms TITAN RTX by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	158 −1.3%	160−170 +1.3%
1440p	104 −5.8%	110−120 +5.8%
4K	76 −5.3%	80−85 +5.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

70−75

−12.9%

79
+12.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 −9.5%	104 +9.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95−100 −9.5%	104 +9.5%
Battlefield 5	190−200 −10%	209 +10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 −10%	143 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Far Cry 5	110−120 −15.5%	127 +15.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	180−190 −11.7%	201 +11.7%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 −10%	187 +10%
Hitman 3	110−120 −6.4%	117 +6.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 −10.7%	332 +10.7%
Metro Exodus	130−140 −10.8%	144 +10.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −15.5%	127 +15.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 −17%	351 +17%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−105 −12%	112 +12%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 −11.8%	95 +11.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 −10%	88 +10%
Battlefield 5	190−200 −6.8%	203 +6.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −9.2%	131 +9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −6.3%	101 +6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 −10%	154 +10%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 −10.4%	254 +10.4%
Hitman 3	85−90 −10.6%	94 +10.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 −12%	336 +12%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −14.2%	137 +14.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −14.5%	126 +14.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260−270 −10%	286 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	250−260 −6.8%	267 +6.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	190−200 −7.4%	204 +7.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −6.7%	80 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 −7.4%	102 +7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 −11.4%	78 +11.4%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −12.9%	79 +12.9%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 −9.4%	175 +9.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −9%	218 +9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 −10%	242 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 −6.9%	139 +6.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	80−85 −7.5%	86 +7.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−11.8%

123
+11.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −8.9%	95−100 +8.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −10.8%	144 +10.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 −8%	50−55 +8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −10%	66 +10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 −10.9%	122 +10.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −10%	66 +10%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −11.7%	134 +11.7%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −12.1%	157 +12.1%
Hitman 3	90−95 −11.1%	100 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −12%	168 +12%
Metro Exodus	100−105 −14%	114 +14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	170−180 −7.6%	183 +7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −10%	75−80 +10%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −7.7%	70 +7.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−8.2%

119
+8.2%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 −10%	88 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −11.7%	67 +11.7%
Hitman 3	45−50 −6.7%	48 +6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −10%	65−70 +10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −10%	66 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 −8.4%	103 +8.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −15.6%	52 +15.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −7.5%	43 +7.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −11.1%	50 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −8.9%	49 +8.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −14%	114 +14%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −7.4%	102 +7.4%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −9.3%	82 +9.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −7.5%	43 +7.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

−13.8%

74
+13.8%

This is how TITAN RTX and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 1% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 6% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	48.83	51.83
Recency	18 December 2018	13 November 2023
Cost	$2499	$999
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	190 Watt