Radeon PRO W7700 vs TITAN RTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
47.92

PRO W7700 outperforms TITAN RTX by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1174.08
Power efficiency12.0221.65
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameTU102Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

PRO W7700 has 3411% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46083072
Core clock speed1350 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8499.2
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs288192
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores7248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

TITAN RTX 47.92
PRO W7700 58.58
+22.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

TITAN RTX 18858
PRO W7700 23050
+22.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD164
−22%
200−210
+22%
1440p103
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
4K74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.24
−205%
5.00
+205%
1440p24.26
−191%
8.33
+191%
4K33.77
−204%
11.10
+204%
  • PRO W7700 has 205% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 has 191% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 has 204% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 264
−13.6%
300−310
+13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 166
−20.5%
200−210
+20.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 198
−21.2%
240−250
+21.2%
Battlefield 5 163
−16.6%
190−200
+16.6%
Counter-Strike 2 141
−20.6%
170−180
+20.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%
Far Cry 5 165
−21.2%
200−210
+21.2%
Fortnite 169
−18.3%
200−210
+18.3%
Forza Horizon 4 187
−17.6%
220−230
+17.6%
Forza Horizon 5 168
−19%
200−210
+19%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
−18.8%
240−250
+18.8%
Valorant 348
−14.9%
400−450
+14.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 118
−18.6%
140−150
+18.6%
Battlefield 5 164
−22%
200−210
+22%
Counter-Strike 2 120
−16.7%
140−150
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−7.9%
300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%
Dota 2 155
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Far Cry 5 156
−21.8%
190−200
+21.8%
Fortnite 176
−19.3%
210−220
+19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 186
−18.3%
220−230
+18.3%
Forza Horizon 5 153
−17.6%
180−190
+17.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
−18.4%
180−190
+18.4%
Metro Exodus 134
−19.4%
160−170
+19.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
−16.6%
190−200
+16.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
−12.4%
300−310
+12.4%
Valorant 336
−19%
400−450
+19%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160
−18.8%
190−200
+18.8%
Counter-Strike 2 110
−18.2%
130−140
+18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
Dota 2 148
−21.6%
180−190
+21.6%
Far Cry 5 146
−16.4%
170−180
+16.4%
Forza Horizon 4 175
−20%
210−220
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
−17.6%
160−170
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
−15.1%
160−170
+15.1%
Valorant 236
−18.6%
280−290
+18.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 134
−19.4%
160−170
+19.4%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
−11.5%
350−400
+11.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
−14%
130−140
+14%
Metro Exodus 85
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−20%
210−220
+20%
Valorant 307
−14%
350−400
+14%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−21.2%
80−85
+21.2%
Far Cry 5 134
−19.4%
160−170
+19.4%
Forza Horizon 4 157
−21%
190−200
+21%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
−22%
150−160
+22%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
−19.4%
160−170
+19.4%
Metro Exodus 55
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
Valorant 300
−16.7%
350−400
+16.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Counter-Strike 2 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Dota 2 146
−16.4%
170−180
+16.4%
Far Cry 5 80
−18.8%
95−100
+18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−14%
130−140
+14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%

This is how TITAN RTX and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 22% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 is 17% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.92 58.58
Recency 18 December 2018 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 190 Watt

TITAN RTX has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 22.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 47.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the TITAN RTX in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 820 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN RTX or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.