Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
31.99

RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms RTX 2070 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking161157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.297.40
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN18E-G2 TU106N19E-Q3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$1758 $2890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2070 Mobile has 53% better value for money than RTX 4000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1215 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate213.8249.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Mobile 31.99
RTX 4000 Mobile 32.32
+1%

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 2070 Mobile 12354
RTX 4000 Mobile 12482
+1%

Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile by 1% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2070 Mobile 26005
+2.5%
RTX 4000 Mobile 25371

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 3% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 2070 Mobile 64151
+14%
RTX 4000 Mobile 56250

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 14% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2070 Mobile 20392
+8.2%
RTX 4000 Mobile 18849

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 8% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 2070 Mobile 123004
+3.3%
RTX 4000 Mobile 119052

GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RTX 2070 Mobile 444708
RTX 4000 Mobile 445161
+0.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
+15.1%
106
−15.1%
1440p73
+14.1%
64
−14.1%
4K48
−2.1%
49
+2.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81 no data
Battlefield 5 142 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 125 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 127 no data
Forza Horizon 4 113 no data
Hitman 3 100 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 166 no data
Metro Exodus 143 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 106 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 93 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 84 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69 no data
Battlefield 5 127 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 97 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 93 no data
Forza Horizon 4 287 no data
Hitman 3 81 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 230 no data
Metro Exodus 110 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 211 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 73 no data
Forza Horizon 4 94 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 114 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 56 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 78 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 88 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 76 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 56 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 87 no data
Metro Exodus 74 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 42 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 36 no data
Hitman 3 36 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 26 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50 no data
Metro Exodus 42 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 23 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 37 no data

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and RTX 4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 15% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 14% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Mobile is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.99 32.32
Recency 6 January 2019 27 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 110 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 437 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 27 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.