Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
36.64
+100%

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms 780M by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132301
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiency21.8283.65
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104BHawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1140 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8129.6
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores4012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 36.64
+100%
Radeon 780M 18.32

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 29093
+128%
Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 70601
+69.6%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 22016
+176%
Radeon 780M 7987

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 126287
+162%
Radeon 780M 48112

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 481195
+12%
Radeon 780M 429810

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2070 Super Mobile 8272
+193%
Radeon 780M 2822

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
+243%
35
−243%
1440p77
+328%
18
−328%
4K45
+275%
12
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+61.5%
39
−61.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+154%
40−45
−154%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+177%
30−33
−177%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+96.7%
60−65
−96.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 115
+211%
35−40
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+103%
31
−103%
Far Cry 5 146
+240%
40−45
−240%
Far Cry New Dawn 162
+231%
45−50
−231%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+60%
110−120
−60%
Hitman 3 105
+200%
35−40
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+72.2%
90−95
−72.2%
Metro Exodus 144
+129%
60−65
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+143%
45−50
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+120%
60−65
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+43.7%
85−90
−43.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+90.2%
40−45
−90.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+96.7%
60−65
−96.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+173%
35−40
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+163%
24
−163%
Far Cry 5 119
+177%
40−45
−177%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+129%
45−50
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+60%
110−120
−60%
Hitman 3 104
+197%
35−40
−197%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+72.2%
90−95
−72.2%
Metro Exodus 144
+129%
60−65
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+98%
45−50
−98%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+144%
54
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+81%
40−45
−81%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+43.7%
85−90
−43.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+53.7%
40−45
−53.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+103%
30−33
−103%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+103%
35−40
−103%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+174%
23
−174%
Far Cry 5 83
+93%
40−45
−93%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+60%
110−120
−60%
Hitman 3 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+128%
53
−128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+187%
46
−187%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+200%
29
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+239%
18
−239%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+120%
45−50
−120%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
+168%
27−30
−168%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+195%
18−20
−195%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+175%
20−22
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Far Cry 5 60
+186%
21−24
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+107%
100−105
−107%
Hitman 3 61
+177%
21−24
−177%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+111%
35−40
−111%
Metro Exodus 89
+162%
30−35
−162%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+172%
32
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+160%
20
−160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+67.3%
110−120
−67.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+180%
30−33
−180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+193%
14−16
−193%
Hitman 3 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+84%
90−95
−84%
Metro Exodus 67
+253%
18−20
−253%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+293%
15
−293%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+227%
10−12
−227%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+220%
10−11
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Far Cry 5 31
+210%
10−11
−210%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+100%
24−27
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+188%
17
−188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+213%
8−9
−213%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+169%
16−18
−169%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 243% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 328% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 275% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Super Mobile surpassed Radeon 780M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.64 18.32
Recency 2 April 2020 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 100% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 394 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1535 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.