Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.
RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 324% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 91 | 426 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 24.38 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Xe LPG |
| GPU code name | TU106 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 December 2021 (2 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $530 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2176 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 184 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 224.4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 14 GB/s | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | no data |
| CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 100−110
+300%
| 25
−300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+350%
|
6−7
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
| Hitman 3 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+356%
|
9−10
−356%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+350%
|
6−7
−350%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 50
+400%
|
10−11
−400%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+350%
|
6−7
−350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
| Hitman 3 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+356%
|
9−10
−356%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−33
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+350%
|
6−7
−350%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 39
+333%
|
9−10
−333%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
+343%
|
7−8
−343%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+340%
|
5−6
−340%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+370%
|
10−11
−370%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+356%
|
9−10
−356%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30
+329%
|
7−8
−329%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+338%
|
8−9
−338%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+350%
|
6−7
−350%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+375%
|
4−5
−375%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+400%
|
3−4
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
| Hitman 3 | 12−14
+333%
|
3−4
−333%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+400%
|
4−5
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+367%
|
3−4
−367%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
This is how RTX 2060 12 GB and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- RTX 2060 12 GB is 300% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 41.15 | 9.70 |
| Recency | 7 December 2021 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
The GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
