Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.67

PRO W7900 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29313
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.57
Power efficiency28.6317.72
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (2 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed1185 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53958.1
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs64384
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores3296

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−305%
170−180
+305%
1440p34
−282%
130−140
+282%
4K25
−300%
100−110
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data23.52
1440pno data30.76
4Kno data39.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 49
−288%
190−200
+288%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
−305%
170−180
+305%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−293%
240−250
+293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
−305%
170−180
+305%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−285%
450−500
+285%
Hitman 3 44
−286%
170−180
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−285%
350−400
+285%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
−293%
240−250
+293%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−305%
85−90
+305%
Battlefield 5 60−65
−293%
240−250
+293%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−300%
120−130
+300%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−285%
450−500
+285%
Hitman 3 43
−295%
170−180
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−285%
350−400
+285%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−291%
250−260
+291%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
−303%
250−260
+303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−298%
350−400
+298%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−286%
27−30
+286%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−285%
450−500
+285%
Hitman 3 39
−285%
150−160
+285%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−285%
350−400
+285%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−300%
220−230
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−294%
130−140
+294%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
−289%
70−75
+289%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−300%
200−210
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−289%
140−150
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−288%
400−450
+288%
Hitman 3 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−295%
150−160
+295%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
−304%
190−200
+304%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−305%
450−500
+305%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Hitman 3 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
−265%
350−400
+265%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7900 is 305% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7900 is 282% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7900 is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.67 75.77
Recency 17 December 2021 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 555.6% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has a 305.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2159 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.