GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W7600

Place in performance ranking	62	279
Place by popularity	not in top-100	30
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	74.86	no data
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 33	GN20-S7
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	17 December 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$579 (1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Boost clock speed	2440 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	30-45 Watt
Texture fill rate	312.3	189.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon PRO W7600 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	18 GB/s	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 2.1	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 +138%	42 −138%
1440p	70−75 +141%	29 −141%
4K	75−80 +150%	30 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

120−130

+145%

49
−145%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +143%	35−40 −143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +138%	42 −138%
Battlefield 5	150−160 +146%	60−65 −146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +150%	35−40 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−105 +138%	42 −138%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +150%	40−45 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +144%	85−90 −144%
Hitman 3	110−120 +150%	44 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +143%	70−75 −143%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +142%	60−65 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +135%	50−55 −135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +140%	75 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +139%	46 −139%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +143%	35−40 −143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +138%	21 −138%
Battlefield 5	150−160 +146%	60−65 −146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +150%	35−40 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +150%	30 −150%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +150%	40−45 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +144%	85−90 −144%
Hitman 3	50−55 +138%	21 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +143%	70−75 −143%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +142%	60−65 −142%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +135%	50−55 −135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	150−160 +142%	62 −142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +141%	58 −141%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +146%	55−60 −146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90−95 +143%	35−40 −143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +129%	7 −129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +150%	35−40 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +140%	25 −140%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +150%	40−45 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 +144%	85−90 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 +143%	70−75 −143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +136%	55 −136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +142%	33 −142%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +150%	18 −150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+135%

50−55
−135%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +150%	35−40 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +143%	35−40 −143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +143%	37 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +150%	35−40 −150%
Hitman 3	55−60 +150%	21−24 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +150%	35−40 −150%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +150%	30−35 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +134%	47 −134%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+142%

30−35

−142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Hitman 3	35−40 +150%	14−16 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +137%	18−20 −137%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +140%	24−27 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+150%

16−18

−150%

This is how PRO W7600 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

PRO W7600 is 138% faster in 1080p
PRO W7600 is 141% faster in 1440p
PRO W7600 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	46.75	18.66
Recency	3 August 2023	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	30 Watt