Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
17.08

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by a whopping 317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34018
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Power efficiency28.9018.07
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)23 July 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484096
Core clock speed1185 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53747.5
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64256
Tensor Cores256128
Ray Tracing Cores3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
−305%
170−180
+305%
1440p32
−306%
130−140
+306%
4K28
−293%
110−120
+293%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
−305%
300−310
+305%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−304%
190−200
+304%
God of War 43
−295%
170−180
+295%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%
Counter-Strike 2 67
−303%
270−280
+303%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
−305%
170−180
+305%
Far Cry 5 59
−307%
240−250
+307%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−308%
290−300
+308%
Forza Horizon 5 62
−303%
250−260
+303%
God of War 48
−317%
200−210
+317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−315%
270−280
+315%
Valorant 130−140
−307%
550−600
+307%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%
Counter-Strike 2 40
−300%
160−170
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−311%
900−950
+311%
Cyberpunk 2077 29
−314%
120−130
+314%
Dota 2 118
−281%
450−500
+281%
Far Cry 5 53
−315%
220−230
+315%
Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−308%
290−300
+308%
Forza Horizon 5 53
−315%
220−230
+315%
God of War 37
−305%
150−160
+305%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
−312%
280−290
+312%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−305%
150−160
+305%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−315%
270−280
+315%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−314%
240−250
+314%
Valorant 130−140
−307%
550−600
+307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−305%
300−310
+305%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−300%
100−105
+300%
Dota 2 110
−309%
450−500
+309%
Far Cry 5 49
−308%
200−210
+308%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−308%
290−300
+308%
God of War 23
−313%
95−100
+313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−315%
270−280
+315%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−294%
130−140
+294%
Valorant 130−140
−307%
550−600
+307%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
−272%
350−400
+272%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−294%
500−550
+294%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−305%
150−160
+305%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−294%
650−700
+294%
Valorant 160−170
−317%
700−750
+317%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−308%
200−210
+308%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Far Cry 5 37
−305%
150−160
+305%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
God of War 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−300%
160−170
+300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Valorant 95−100
−308%
400−450
+308%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Dota 2 34
−312%
140−150
+312%
Far Cry 5 18
−317%
75−80
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120−130
+300%
God of War 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−312%
70−75
+312%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 305% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 306% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 293% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.08 71.18
Recency 17 December 2021 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 566.7% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 316.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2905 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.