GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile vs RTX 2050 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.08

RTX 3050 A Mobile outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking304192
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Power efficiency28.7146.85
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed1185 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz1343 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate94.5375.21
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6456
Tensor Cores25656
Ray Tracing Cores3214

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
1440p34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
4K25
−60%
40−45
+60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 76
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 5 49
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Valorant 87
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Dota 2 85
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Far Cry 5 70
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Fortnite 100−105
−60%
160−170
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 63
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Valorant 43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
World of Tanks 220−230
−57%
350−400
+57%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Dota 2 110
−54.5%
170−180
+54.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−58.7%
100−105
+58.7%
Forza Horizon 4 56
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Forza Horizon 5 33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%
Valorant 75−80
−57.9%
120−130
+57.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−60.7%
270−280
+60.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
World of Tanks 120−130
−56.3%
200−210
+56.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−53.1%
75−80
+53.1%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−59.6%
75−80
+59.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Valorant 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Fortnite 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RTX 3050 A Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 62% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 A Mobile is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.08 29.50

RTX 3050 A Mobile has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2405 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 11 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.