Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs GeForce MX570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 and Qualcomm Adreno 690, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce MX570
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
14.88
+447%

MX570 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 690 by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355806
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.8026.64
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed832 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate73.92no data
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.88
+447%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 2.72

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5735
+447%
Qualcomm Adreno 690 1049

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+420%
25
−420%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%
Hitman 3 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+355%
10−12
−355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+215%
12−14
−215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+69.6%
45−50
−69.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+193%
14−16
−193%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%
Hitman 3 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+355%
10−12
−355%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+215%
12−14
−215%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+69.6%
45−50
−69.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+250%
10−11
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+220%
30−33
−220%
Hitman 3 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+145%
30−35
−145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+289%
9
−289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+69.6%
45−50
−69.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+215%
12−14
−215%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+670%
10−11
−670%
Hitman 3 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+194%
30−35
−194%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Hitman 3 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Qualcomm Adreno 690 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 420% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GeForce MX570 surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 690 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.88 2.72
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 7 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 447.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 690, on the other hand, has a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 690 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Qualcomm Adreno 690
Adreno 690

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.