GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs MX570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce MX570 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms MX570 by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 353 | 216 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 41.12 | 28.96 |
Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
GPU code name | GA107 | GN20-P0-R 6 GB |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | May 2022 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 1492 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 4.731 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 40 | no data |
TMUs | 64 | no data |
Tensor Cores | 64 | no data |
Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.3 | - |
CUDA | 8.6 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 34
−103%
| 69
+103%
|
1440p | 21−24
−76.2%
| 37
+76.2%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−80.8%
|
45−50
+80.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−179%
|
81
+179%
|
Elden Ring | 45−50
−84.4%
|
80−85
+84.4%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−60.4%
|
75−80
+60.4%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−80.8%
|
45−50
+80.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
−10.3%
|
32
+10.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−72.1%
|
105
+72.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 40−45
−61%
|
65−70
+61%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
−52.8%
|
55−60
+52.8%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−71.2%
|
100−110
+71.2%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−60.4%
|
75−80
+60.4%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−53.8%
|
40
+53.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+26.1%
|
23
−26.1%
|
Dota 2 | 12
−408%
|
61
+408%
|
Elden Ring | 45−50
−84.4%
|
80−85
+84.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 68
−42.6%
|
97
+42.6%
|
Fortnite | 80−85
−51.8%
|
120−130
+51.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−41%
|
86
+41%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
−71.7%
|
91
+71.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 40−45
−61%
|
65−70
+61%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
−47.7%
|
150−160
+47.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 35−40
−52.8%
|
55−60
+52.8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−82.2%
|
80−85
+82.2%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−71.2%
|
100−110
+71.2%
|
World of Tanks | 190−200
−34.2%
|
250−260
+34.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−60.4%
|
75−80
+60.4%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
−80.8%
|
45−50
+80.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+52.6%
|
19
−52.6%
|
Dota 2 | 50−55
−59.3%
|
85−90
+59.3%
|
Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−40%
|
75−80
+40%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−24.6%
|
76
+24.6%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−110
−47.7%
|
150−160
+47.7%
|
Valorant | 55−60
−71.2%
|
100−110
+71.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 21−24
−90.5%
|
40
+90.5%
|
Elden Ring | 21−24
−91.3%
|
40−45
+91.3%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−81.8%
|
40
+81.8%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
−32.6%
|
170−180
+32.6%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 12−14
−76.9%
|
21−24
+76.9%
|
World of Tanks | 100−110
−59.6%
|
160−170
+59.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−33
−70%
|
50−55
+70%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
−90.9%
|
21−24
+90.9%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−106%
|
70−75
+106%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−58.3%
|
57
+58.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 30−35
−72.7%
|
55−60
+72.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
−94.7%
|
37
+94.7%
|
Valorant | 35−40
−83.8%
|
65−70
+83.8%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−130%
|
21−24
+130%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
−69.2%
|
40−45
+69.2%
|
Elden Ring | 10−11
−100%
|
20−22
+100%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−69.2%
|
40−45
+69.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
−90%
|
18−20
+90%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
−75%
|
75−80
+75%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
−60%
|
16−18
+60%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−69.2%
|
40−45
+69.2%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
−85.7%
|
24−27
+85.7%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−130%
|
21−24
+130%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Dota 2 | 24−27
−69.2%
|
40−45
+69.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−73.7%
|
30−35
+73.7%
|
Fortnite | 16−18
−82.4%
|
30−35
+82.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−85.7%
|
35−40
+85.7%
|
Valorant | 16−18
−106%
|
30−35
+106%
|
This is how GeForce MX570 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 103% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 76% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 53% faster.
- in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 408% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GeForce MX570 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 14.90 | 25.18 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 60 Watt |
GeForce MX570 has 140% lower power consumption.
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 69% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.