HD Graphics P530 vs GeForce MX350

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX350 with HD Graphics P530, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX350
2020
2 GB GDDR5, 20 Watt
7.28
+162%

MX350 outperforms HD Graphics P530 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking536796
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.3712.92
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGP107Skylake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 February 2020 (4 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640192
Core clock speed747 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9818.40
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS0.4416 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX350 7.28
+162%
HD Graphics P530 2.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX350 2807
+161%
HD Graphics P530 1074

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+189%
9−10
−189%
1440p27
+170%
10−12
−170%
4K26
+189%
9−10
−189%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+144%
9−10
−144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+171%
7−8
−171%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+400%
7−8
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%
Hitman 3 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+514%
21−24
−514%
Metro Exodus 37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+357%
7−8
−357%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95
+150%
35−40
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry New Dawn 25
+257%
7−8
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%
Hitman 3 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 116
+452%
21−24
−452%
Metro Exodus 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+243%
7−8
−243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+108%
12−14
−108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 88
+132%
35−40
−132%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry 5 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hitman 3 17
+113%
8−9
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−533%
35−40
+533%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20
+186%
7−8
−186%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Hitman 3 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

This is how GeForce MX350 and HD Graphics P530 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is 189% faster in 1080p
  • GeForce MX350 is 170% faster in 1440p
  • GeForce MX350 is 189% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX350 is 1200% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P530 is 533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX350 is ahead in 56 tests (93%)
  • HD Graphics P530 is ahead in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.28 2.78
Recency 10 February 2020 1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1740 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX350 has a 161.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 17.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD Graphics P530, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX350 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P530 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook card while HD Graphics P530 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350
Intel HD Graphics P530
HD Graphics P530

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1616 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 23 votes

Rate HD Graphics P530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.