Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Place in the ranking	1173	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	11.12
Power efficiency	1.07	13.48
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G71	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	18 April 2006 (18 years ago)	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	10752
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	500 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	604.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	112
TMUs	24	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	48 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	38.4 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.7
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7900 GTX 0.70

RTX A6000 58.63
+8276%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GTX 270

RTX A6000 22535
+8246%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −8650%	175 +8650%
1440p	1−2 −12800%	129 +12800%
4K	1−2 −11300%	114 +11300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	26.57
1440p	no data	36.04
4K	no data	40.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2150%	130−140 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4300%	130−140 +4300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2150%	130−140 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4300%	130−140 +4300%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −4186%	300 +4186%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2040%	100−110 +2040%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2150%	130−140 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4300%	130−140 +4300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −875%	78 +875%
Fortnite	1−2 −23000%	230−240 +23000%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −4086%	293 +4086%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2289%	210−220 +2289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −2040%	100−110 +2040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	18−20 −1368%	270−280 +1368%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −2150%	130−140 +2150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4300%	130−140 +4300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1363%	110−120 +1363%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −4014%	288 +4014%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2289%	210−220 +2289%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −4275%	170−180 +4275%
World of Tanks	2−3 −19150%	350−400 +19150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −135%	70−75 +135%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2300%	70−75 +2300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2925%	120−130 +2925%
Valorant	5−6 −4440%	220−230 +4440%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −933%	155 +933%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −933%	155 +933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −10300%	200−210 +10300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −933%	155 +933%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	70−75
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Dota 2	14−16 −753%	128 +753%
Valorant	1−2 −12700%	120−130 +12700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	66 +0%	66 +0%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	132 +0%	132 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	128 +0%	128 +0%
Metro Exodus	78 +0%	78 +0%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	131 +0%	131 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	96 +0%	96 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	96 +0%	96 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	247 +0%	247 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	63 +0%	63 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	70 +0%	70 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	149 +0%	149 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

This is how Go 7900 GTX and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

RTX A6000 is 8650% faster in 1080p
RTX A6000 is 12800% faster in 1440p
RTX A6000 is 11300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A6000 is 23000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX A6000 is ahead in 34 tests (54%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (46%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.70	58.63
Recency	18 April 2006	5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	48 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	300 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A6000, on the other hand, has a 8275.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.