UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7900 GTX and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7900 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.70

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms Go 7900 GTX by a whopping 230% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1173856
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameG71Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3216
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.00no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−267%
11
+267%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Fortnite 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
World of Tanks 18−20
−126%
40−45
+126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−100%
14
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
World of Tanks 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Valorant 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
Valorant 8
+0%
8
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4
+0%
4
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 22
+0%
22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how Go 7900 GTX and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 267% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 30 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 2.31
Recency 18 April 2006 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 230% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 361 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.