Quadro P620 vs GeForce Go 7400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7400 with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

Go 7400
2006
128 MB GDDR3
0.17

P620 outperforms Go 7400 by a whopping 5488% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1416469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.37
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG72GP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (18 years ago)1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7512
Core clock speed450 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1443 MHz
Number of transistors112 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80046.18
Floating-point processing powerno data1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7400 0.17
Quadro P620 9.50
+5488%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7400 65
Quadro P620 3653
+5520%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−148

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−967%
64
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2400%
125
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−525%
24−27
+525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%
World of Tanks 10−11
−1280%
130−140
+1280%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−183%
16−18
+183%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Valorant 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 14−16
−33.3%
20−22
+33.3%
Valorant 0−1 9−10

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Elden Ring 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
World of Tanks 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Elden Ring 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 4500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 9.50
Recency 1 February 2006 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Quadro P620 has a 5488.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7400 is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400
GeForce Go 7400
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 637 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.