Quadro P620 vs GeForce Go 7800

Place in the ranking	1330	468
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.60	16.46
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	G70	GP107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	3 March 2006 (18 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	22	512
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	400 MHz	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	302 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	110 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.400	46.18
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	16	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	550 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	35.2 GB/s	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7800 0.30

Quadro P620 9.44
+3047%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7800 114

Quadro P620 3641
+3094%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

1−2

−4300%

44
+4300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−650%

14−16
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1275%	55 +1275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −118%	60−65 +118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −675%	30−35 +675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −189%	24−27 +189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −118%	60−65 +118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	50−55 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −675%	30−35 +675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −118%	60−65 +118%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Hitman 3	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−700%

16−18
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−350%

9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 +0%	35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	28 +0%	28 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how Go 7800 and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 4300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.30	9.44
Recency	3 March 2006	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	110 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	40 Watt

Go 7800 has 14.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 3046.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.