Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Mobile with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Mobile
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.31
+28.3%

GTX 980 Mobile outperforms T1000 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking264335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.93no data
Power efficiency7.4423.18
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date21 September 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.82 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1064 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100-200 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate136.2no data
Floating-point processing power4.358 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs128no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+32%
75−80
−32%
4K46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.00no data
4K8.60no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Fortnite 100−110
+31.3%
80−85
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Valorant 140−150
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+32.2%
180−190
−32.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Dota 2 110−120
+31.8%
85−90
−31.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Fortnite 100−110
+31.3%
80−85
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+29.2%
65−70
−29.2%
Valorant 140−150
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Dota 2 110−120
+31.8%
85−90
−31.8%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+36.7%
60−65
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Valorant 140−150
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+31.3%
80−85
−31.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+31.8%
110−120
−31.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+33.1%
130−140
−33.1%
Valorant 180−190
+32.9%
140−150
−32.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Valorant 110−120
+28.9%
90−95
−28.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Dota 2 65−70
+38%
50−55
−38%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

This is how GTX 980 Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Mobile is 32% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Mobile is 31% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.31 16.61
Recency 21 September 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 980 Mobile has a 28.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
GeForce GTX 980
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 81 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 438 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 Mobile or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.