Radeon R7 260 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Radeon R7 260, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.88
+377%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms R7 260 by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.393.76
Power efficiency9.905.46
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGM200Bonaire
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)17 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 Ti has 283% better value for money than R7 260.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate189.448.00
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPS1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs17648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm170 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1 x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s104 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort support-+
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
DDMA audiono data+
GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.88
+377%
R7 260 7.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13796
+377%
R7 260 2891

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+287%
R7 260 4380

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+450%
18−21
−450%
1440p51
+410%
10−12
−410%
4K53
+430%
10−12
−430%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.56
−8.3%
6.06
+8.3%
1440p12.73
−16.7%
10.90
+16.7%
4K12.25
−12.3%
10.90
+12.3%
  • R7 260 has 8% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • R7 260 has 17% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • R7 260 has 12% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+421%
14−16
−421%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Elden Ring 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+421%
14−16
−421%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+386%
35−40
−386%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+414%
14−16
−414%
Valorant 140−150
+430%
27−30
−430%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+421%
14−16
−421%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Dota 2 23
+475%
4−5
−475%
Elden Ring 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+417%
18−20
−417%
Fortnite 160−170
+437%
30−33
−437%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+386%
35−40
−386%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+386%
7−8
−386%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+383%
40−45
−383%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+414%
14−16
−414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+400%
10−11
−400%
Valorant 140−150
+430%
27−30
−430%
World of Tanks 270−280
+407%
55−60
−407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+421%
14−16
−421%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+421%
14−16
−421%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Dota 2 110−120
+379%
24−27
−379%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+417%
18−20
−417%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+386%
35−40
−386%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+383%
40−45
−383%
Valorant 140−150
+430%
27−30
−430%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Elden Ring 70−75
+407%
14−16
−407%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+450%
12−14
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+400%
35−40
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
World of Tanks 220−230
+409%
45−50
−409%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+379%
24−27
−379%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+386%
21−24
−386%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+394%
16−18
−394%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Valorant 100−110
+419%
21−24
−419%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+414%
7−8
−414%
Dota 2 79
+394%
16−18
−394%
Elden Ring 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+394%
16−18
−394%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+394%
16−18
−394%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+414%
7−8
−414%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Dota 2 132
+389%
27−30
−389%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+383%
12−14
−383%
Valorant 55−60
+460%
10−11
−460%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and R7 260 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 450% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 410% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 430% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.88 7.52
Recency 2 June 2015 17 December 2013
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has a 377.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

R7 260, on the other hand, has 117.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 260 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
AMD Radeon R7 260
Radeon R7 260

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1615 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.