GeForce RTX 4090 vs GTX 980 Ti

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5
35.66

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 180% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1301
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Value for money4.1810.79
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGM200AD102-300-A1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (8 years old)20 September 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $1,599
Current price$1195 (1.8x MSRP)$1756 (1.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4090 has 158% better value for money than GTX 980 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores281616384
CUDA cores2816no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate176 billion/sec1,290
Floating-point performance6,060 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)304 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot3-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pin + 8-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.21x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.66
RTX 4090 100.00
+180%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 180% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 980 Ti 13811
RTX 4090 38730
+180%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 180% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Ti 48631
RTX 4090 137170
+182%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 182% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 980 Ti 23057
RTX 4090 104937
+355%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 355% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 16961
RTX 4090 73174
+331%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 331% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 980 Ti 98958
RTX 4090 250667
+153%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 153% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 980 Ti 443119
RTX 4090 771257
+74.1%

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 980 Ti by 74% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
−162%
265
+162%
1440p49
−333%
212
+333%
4K50
−200%
150
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−263%
225
+263%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−262%
235
+262%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−363%
287
+363%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−82.1%
190−200
+82.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
−83.5%
170−180
+83.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−258%
222
+258%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−130%
209
+130%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−105%
178
+105%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−181%
300−350
+181%
Hitman 3 110−120
−93.8%
210−220
+93.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−257%
275
+257%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−246%
294
+246%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−181%
188
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
−240%
221
+240%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−300%
248
+300%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−82.1%
190−200
+82.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
−368%
170−180
+368%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−245%
214
+245%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−121%
201
+121%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−96.6%
171
+96.6%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−181%
300−350
+181%
Hitman 3 110−120
−93.8%
210−220
+93.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−225%
250
+225%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−259%
226
+259%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−221%
180−190
+221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−773%
288
+773%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−551%
573
+551%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−158%
173
+158%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
−289%
179
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−255%
220
+255%
Battlefield 5 94
−105%
190−200
+105%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−239%
210
+239%
Far Cry 5 77
−143%
187
+143%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−77%
154
+77%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−333%
300−350
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
−417%
305
+417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−128%
153
+128%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 54
−176%
140−150
+176%
Hitman 3 65−70
−228%
210−220
+228%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−384%
237
+384%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−366%
177
+366%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−232%
90−95
+232%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−421%
271
+421%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−297%
155
+297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−369%
183
+369%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−158%
190−200
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−470%
154
+470%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−191%
186
+191%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−124%
152
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−277%
280−290
+277%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−447%
268
+447%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−390%
152
+390%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−200%
95−100
+200%
Hitman 3 35−40
−266%
120−130
+266%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−619%
187
+619%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−471%
137
+471%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−237%
60−65
+237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 23
−709%
186
+709%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−536%
280
+536%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−567%
120
+567%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−445%
120
+445%
Battlefield 5 40
−240%
130−140
+240%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−627%
80
+627%
Far Cry 5 30
−477%
173
+477%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−292%
145
+292%
Forza Horizon 4 42
−505%
250−260
+505%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−550%
117
+550%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 162% faster than GTX 980 Ti in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 333% faster than GTX 980 Ti in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 200% faster than GTX 980 Ti in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 773% faster than the GTX 980 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed GTX 980 Ti in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 35.66 100.00
Recency 2 June 2015 20 September 2022
Cost $649 $1599
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980 Ti in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1357 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11088 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.