GeForce GT 650M SLI vs GTX 980 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GeForce GT 650M SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
39.38
+674%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms GT 650M SLI by a whopping 674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.21no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIN13E-GE
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date22 September 2015 (9 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096768
Core clock speed1126 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz835 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2x2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz4000 MHz
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 39.38
+674%
GT 650M SLI 5.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 33169
+822%
GT 650M SLI 3597

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile 47704
+272%
GT 650M SLI 12812

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p600−650
+659%
79
−659%
Full HD130
+165%
49
−165%
4K69
+763%
8−9
−763%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+531%
12−14
−531%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+740%
10−11
−740%
Elden Ring 130−140
+962%
12−14
−962%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+531%
12−14
−531%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+740%
10−11
−740%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+810%
21−24
−810%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+381%
16−18
−381%
Valorant 150−160
+1217%
12−14
−1217%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+531%
12−14
−531%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+740%
10−11
−740%
Dota 2 120−130
+624%
16−18
−624%
Elden Ring 130−140
+962%
12−14
−962%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+288%
24−27
−288%
Fortnite 170−180
+473%
30−33
−473%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+810%
21−24
−810%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+618%
16−18
−618%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+683%
12−14
−683%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+367%
40−45
−367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+381%
16−18
−381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 141
+781%
16−18
−781%
Valorant 150−160
+1217%
12−14
−1217%
World of Tanks 270−280
+101%
139
−101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+531%
12−14
−531%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+740%
10−11
−740%
Dota 2 120−130
+624%
16−18
−624%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+288%
24−27
−288%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+810%
21−24
−810%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+367%
40−45
−367%
Valorant 150−160
+1217%
12−14
−1217%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
Elden Ring 80−85
+1233%
6−7
−1233%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1725%
4−5
−1725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+430%
30−35
−430%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
World of Tanks 240−250
+573%
35−40
−573%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+813%
8−9
−813%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+1055%
10−12
−1055%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1529%
7−8
−1529%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+2025%
4−5
−2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%
Valorant 120−130
+786%
14−16
−786%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Dota 2 75−80
+353%
16−18
−353%
Elden Ring 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+814%
14−16
−814%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+388%
16−18
−388%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+720%
5−6
−720%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Dota 2 75−80
+353%
16−18
−353%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+867%
6−7
−867%
Fortnite 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1525%
4−5
−1525%
Valorant 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and GT 650M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 659% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 165% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 763% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 3200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 980 SLI Mobile surpassed GT 650M SLI in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.38 5.09
Recency 22 September 2015 22 March 2012

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has a 673.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 650M SLI in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 66 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.