GRID K220Q vs GeForce GTX 970M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 970M with GRID K220Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 970M
2014
6 GB GDDR5
14.86
+530%

GTX 970M outperforms GRID K220Q by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking334807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.14no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM204GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)2 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,560.89 $469
Current price$848 (0.3x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801536
CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed924 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown225 Watt
Texture fill rate83.0495.36
Floating-point performance2,657 gflops2,289 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 970M and GRID K220Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth120 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 970M 14.86
+530%
GRID K220Q 2.36

GeForce GTX 970M outperforms GRID K220Q by 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 970M 5739
+529%
GRID K220Q 912

GeForce GTX 970M outperforms GRID K220Q by 529% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p136
+548%
21−24
−548%
Full HD59
+556%
9−10
−556%
1440p25
+733%
3−4
−733%
4K22
+633%
3−4
−633%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+509%
21−24
−509%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 260−270
+519%
42
−519%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+525%
24−27
−525%
Battlefield 5 300−310
+477%
52
−477%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180−190
+500%
30−33
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+509%
21−24
−509%
Far Cry 5 300−310
+500%
50
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 300−310
+525%
48
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 350−400
+474%
61
−474%
Hitman 3 180−190
+521%
27−30
−521%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+483%
60−65
−483%
Metro Exodus 300−310
+466%
53
−466%
Red Dead Redemption 2 250−260
+510%
40−45
−510%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+517%
45−50
−517%
Watch Dogs: Legion 300−310
+525%
45−50
−525%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 220−230
+511%
36
−511%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+525%
24−27
−525%
Battlefield 5 270−280
+514%
44
−514%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180−190
+500%
30−33
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+509%
21−24
−509%
Far Cry 5 250−260
+510%
41
−510%
Far Cry New Dawn 230−240
+522%
37
−522%
Forza Horizon 4 800−850
+511%
131
−511%
Hitman 3 180−190
+521%
27−30
−521%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+483%
60−65
−483%
Metro Exodus 250−260
+525%
40
−525%
Red Dead Redemption 2 250−260
+510%
40−45
−510%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+517%
45−50
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 280−290
+522%
45
−522%
Watch Dogs: Legion 300−310
+525%
45−50
−525%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 130−140
+519%
21
−519%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+525%
24−27
−525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180−190
+500%
30−33
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+509%
21−24
−509%
Far Cry 5 180−190
+521%
29
−521%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+511%
36
−511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 350−400
+483%
60−65
−483%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+517%
45−50
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+515%
26
−515%
Watch Dogs: Legion 300−310
+525%
45−50
−525%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 250−260
+510%
40−45
−510%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+515%
26
−515%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+507%
28
−507%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+488%
17
−488%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+525%
12−14
−525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+511%
18−20
−511%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+530%
27
−530%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+509%
23
−509%
Hitman 3 110−120
+511%
18−20
−511%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+500%
30−33
−500%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+500%
25
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+530%
27−30
−530%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 150−160
+525%
24−27
−525%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+525%
12
−525%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+515%
13
−515%
Hitman 3 65−70
+491%
10−12
−491%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+511%
9
−511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+525%
16
−525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+525%
8
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+483%
6
−483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+525%
16−18
−525%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+525%
12
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+515%
12−14
−515%

This is how GTX 970M and GRID K220Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 970M is 548% faster in 900p
  • GTX 970M is 556% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 970M is 733% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 970M is 633% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.86 2.36
Recency 7 October 2014 2 July 2014
Cost $2560.89 $469
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB

The GeForce GTX 970M is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID K220Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M is a notebook card while GRID K220Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GeForce GTX 970M
NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GRID K220Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 293 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GRID K220Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.