Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.86
+63.2%

GTX 965M outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking456586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.5127.59
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM206SVega Renoir
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed944 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown15 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 9.86
+63.2%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 6.04

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 965M 7322
+73.9%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 4210

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 965M 5536
+98.2%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 2793

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M 34748
+59%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 21857

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 965M 259766
+42.3%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 182608

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 965M 1810
+112%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 852

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 965M 66
+161%
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
+125%
20
−125%
1440p26
−7.7%
28
+7.7%
4K20
+0%
20
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+36.4%
11
−36.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+93.8%
16
−93.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 49
+188%
16−18
−188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+66.7%
9
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+72.7%
11
−72.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−79.6%
97
+79.6%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+34.8%
23
−34.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+105%
22
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 69
+214%
21−24
−214%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+1.6%
62
−1.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Battlefield 5 37
+118%
16−18
−118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6
−150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+58.5%
40−45
−58.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−35.2%
73
+35.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+82.4%
17
−82.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+136%
14
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+52.4%
21
−52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 86
+330%
20−22
−330%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+26%
50
−26%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−46.4%
40−45
+46.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+35.3%
17
−35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+77.8%
18
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+63.6%
11
−63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+23.5%
50−55
−23.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 32
+129%
14
−129%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+126%
18−20
−126%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+55%
40−45
−55%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+282%
11
−282%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+333%
3−4
−333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14
+133%
6−7
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 965M and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is 125% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 8% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 965M is 500% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 965M is ahead in 66 tests (93%)
  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.86 6.04
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

GTX 965M has a 63.2% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 965M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 695 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.