Radeon HD 6670 vs GeForce GTX 780M

Place in performance ranking	418	871
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.42	0.08
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	N14E-GTX	Turks
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Design	no data	reference
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	19 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$99
Current price	$1093	$134 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780M has 1675% better value for money than HD 6670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	480
CUDA cores	1536	no data
Core clock speed	823 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	797 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	66 Watt
Texture fill rate	102.0	19.20
Floating-point performance	2,448 gflops	768.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon HD 6670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0	PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Standard memory configuration	GDDR5	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity	no data	1
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200	no data
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 3840x2160	no data
HDMI	+	+
HDCP content protection	+	no data
DisplayPort support	no data	-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	+	no data
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	no data	-
CrossFire	no data	1
Enduro	no data	-
HD3D	no data	-
PowerTune	no data	-
TrueAudio	no data	-
ZeroCore	no data	-
Blu-Ray 3D Support	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	DirectX® 11
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
Mantle	no data	-
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.96
+427%

HD 6670 1.89

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 780M 3847
+427%

HD 6670 730

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 427% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M 5244
+364%

HD 6670 1130

GeForce GTX 780M outperforms Radeon HD 6670 by 364% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

71
+492%

12−14

−492%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80
+400%

14−16

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +421%	45−50 −421%
Hitman 3	100−105 +426%	18−20 −426%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +424%	40−45 −424%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +400%	35−40 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Battlefield 5	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +421%	45−50 −421%
Hitman 3	100−105 +426%	18−20 −426%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +424%	40−45 −424%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +400%	27−30 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	180−190 +414%	35 −414%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +400%	35−40 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +400%	20−22 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +422%	21−24 −422%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +421%	45−50 −421%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +424%	40−45 −424%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 +416%	30−35 −416%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +400%	17 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 +400%	35−40 −400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

140−150

+400%

27−30
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−105 +426%	18−20 −426%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +400%	16−18 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +400%	18−20 −400%
Hitman 3	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +400%	14−16 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+400%

16−18

−400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Hitman 3	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +400%	10−11 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+400%

9−10
−400%

This is how GTX 780M and HD 6670 compete in popular games:

GTX 780M is 492% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.96	1.89
Recency	30 May 2013	19 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	122 Watt	66 Watt