ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 285 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | N14E-GTX | Cedar |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3072 | 80 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 7080 Million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 19 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 5.200 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 0.104 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 170 mm |
Width | no data | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 May 2013 | 4 February 2010 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 19 Watt |
GTX 780M SLI has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
ATI HD 5450, on the other hand, has 952.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780M SLI and Radeon HD 5450. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5450 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.