GeForce GTX 560M vs 780M SLI

Place in performance ranking	255	710
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.87	0.12
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	N14E-GTX	N12E-GS
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	30 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price	$149	$1198

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780M SLI has 36458% better value for money than GTX 560M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	192
CUDA cores	no data	192
Core clock speed	823 MHz	775 MHz
Number of transistors	7080 Million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	24.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	no data	595.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M SLI and GeForce GTX 560M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 4 GB	1536 MB
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	Up to 192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	Up to 60 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	no data	+
3D Gaming	no data	+
Optimus	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 API
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M SLI 20.22
+528%

GTX 560M 3.22

780M SLI outperforms 560M by 528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M SLI 14140
+677%

GTX 560M 1820

780M SLI outperforms 560M by 677% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 780M SLI 36004
+287%

GTX 560M 9300

780M SLI outperforms 560M by 287% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 780M SLI 10091
+631%

GTX 560M 1380

780M SLI outperforms 560M by 631% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	190−200 +513%	31 −513%
Full HD	107 +182%	38 −182%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40	no data
Battlefield 5	65−70	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	65−70	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40	no data
Battlefield 5	65−70	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Hitman 3	40−45	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	65−70	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35	no data
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	no data
Far Cry 5	30−35	no data
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	no data
Hitman 3	24−27	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45	no data
Metro Exodus	35−40 +533%	6−7 −533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +600%	6−7 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16	no data
Hitman 3	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Metro Exodus	18−20	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9	no data