Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition with Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780M Mac Edition
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
6.69

RTX 5000 Max-Q outperforms GTX 780M Mac Edition by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking533134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.1311.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGK104N19E-Q5 MAX-Q
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 November 2013 (10 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$149 $2130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 5000 Max-Q has 925% better value for money than GTX 780M Mac Edition.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363072
Core clock speed771 MHz600 - 930 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1350 - 1455 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt80 - 90 Watt
Texture fill rate102.0259.2
Floating-point performance2,448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−483%
105
+483%
1440p12−14
−442%
65
+442%
4K7−8
−500%
42
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 86
−423%
450−500
+423%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−426%
600−650
+426%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
−395%
500−550
+395%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−406%
450−500
+406%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−404%
700−750
+404%
Hitman 3 70−75
−379%
350−400
+379%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
−425%
850−900
+425%
Metro Exodus 144
−421%
750−800
+421%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
−415%
500−550
+415%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−426%
700−750
+426%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−371%
400−450
+371%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 78
−413%
400−450
+413%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−426%
600−650
+426%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 93
−384%
450−500
+384%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
−406%
450−500
+406%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−404%
700−750
+404%
Hitman 3 70−75
−379%
350−400
+379%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−393%
700−750
+393%
Metro Exodus 116
−417%
600−650
+417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
−395%
450−500
+395%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−426%
700−750
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 145
−417%
750−800
+417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 182
−422%
950−1000
+422%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
−418%
290−300
+418%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 67
−422%
350−400
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−392%
300−310
+392%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−404%
700−750
+404%
Horizon Zero Dawn 108
−409%
550−600
+409%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
−426%
700−750
+426%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 83
−382%
400−450
+382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−410%
260−270
+410%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85
−371%
400−450
+371%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−422%
350−400
+422%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
−424%
550−600
+424%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−421%
250−260
+421%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−426%
200−210
+426%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
−384%
300−310
+384%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−419%
140−150
+419%
Far Cry 5 74
−373%
350−400
+373%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−379%
350−400
+379%
Hitman 3 45−50
−411%
230−240
+411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
−382%
400−450
+382%
Metro Exodus 73
−379%
350−400
+379%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−376%
400−450
+376%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
−414%
190−200
+414%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65
−362%
300−310
+362%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−414%
180−190
+414%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%
Hitman 3 27−30
−417%
150−160
+417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−423%
230−240
+423%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−416%
160−170
+416%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−420%
260−270
+420%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
−416%
160−170
+416%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−424%
110−120
+424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27
−419%
140−150
+419%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
−422%
240−250
+422%
Metro Exodus 43
−412%
220−230
+412%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−424%
110−120
+424%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 34
−400%
170−180
+400%

This is how GTX 780M Mac Edition and RTX 5000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 483% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 442% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5000 Max-Q is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.69 35.31
Recency 8 November 2013 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 80 Watt

The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 41 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.