Arc A350M vs GeForce GTX 780

#ad 
Buy
GTX 780 GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
VS
Arc A350M Arc A370M Arc A380M Arc A530M Arc A550M Arc A570M Arc A730M Arc A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
17.88
+42.8%

GTX 780 outperforms Arc A350M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 GTX 780
Arc A350M Arc A350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.17no data
Power efficiency5.6739.68
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK110DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed863 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate173.255.20
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs19248
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 780 17.88
+42.8%
Arc A350M 12.52

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780 10460
+46.4%
Arc A350M 7147

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD54
+50%
36
−50%
1440p21−24
+31.3%
16
−31.3%
4K12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.02no data
1440p30.90no data
4K54.08no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 25
+0%
25
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10
+0%
10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3
+0%
3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 780 and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 780 is 31% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 780 is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 17.88 12.52
Recency 23 May 2013 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 780 has a 42.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 is a desktop card while Arc A350M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
RX 470 Radeon RX 470
RTX 4070 NVIDIA 4070
vs
GTX 780 780
RTX 4080 NVIDIA 4080
vs
GTX 780 780
RTX 4090 NVIDIA 4090
vs
GTX 780 780
Steam Deck GPU AMD Deck GPU
vs
GTX 780 780
RX 6650 XT AMD RX 6650 XT
vs
GTX 780 780
RX 7800 XT AMD RX 7800 XT
vs
GTX 780 780
Arc A780 Arc A780
vs
GTX 780 780
RTX 3050 OEM NVIDIA 3050 OEM
vs
GTX 780 780
Arc A380 Arc A380
vs
GTX 780 780
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
GTX 780 780

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 1077 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 58 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 or Arc A350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.