NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 1650

General info

Comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
51.79
 
62.48
Architecture
Kepler
 
Turing
Code name
GK110B
 
TU117
Type
Desktop
 
Desktop
Release date
7 November 2013
 
23 April 2019
Launch price (MSRP)
$699
 
$149
Price now
$225
 
$159

Technical specs

GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
2880
 
896
CUDA cores
2880
 
no data
Core clock speed
875 MHz
 
1485 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
 
1665 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
 
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
250 Watt
 
75 Watt
Texture fill rate
210 billion/sec
 
93.24
Floating-point performance
5,345 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
 
no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
10.5" (26.7 cm)
 
229 mm
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
 
no data
Supplementary power connectors
One 8-pin and one 6-pin
 
None
SLI options
+
 
-

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
384 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
7.0 GB/s
 
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
 
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
 
no data
Multi monitor support
4 displays
 
no data
HDMI
+
 
-
HDCP
+
 
-
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
 
no data
G-SYNC support
+
 
-
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
 
no data

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Blu Ray 3D
+
 
-
3D Gaming
+
 
-
3D Vision
+
 
-
GPU Boost
+
 
no data
3D Vision Live
+
 
-
CUDA
+
 
-
GeForce Experience
+
 
no data
FXAA
+
 
no data
TXAA
+
 
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
 
no data

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 (11_1)
 
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.4
 
4.6

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

GTX 780 Ti 42.82 +17.3%
GTX 1650 36.51

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

GTX 780 Ti 75688 +30.2%
GTX 1650 58120

3DMark Fire Strike Score

GTX 780 Ti 9974 +8.3%
GTX 1650 9209

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

GTX 780 Ti 11812 +21.5%
GTX 1650 9718

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

GTX 780 Ti 15619 +15.4%
GTX 1650 13531

3DMark Vantage Performance

GTX 780 Ti 38813
GTX 1650 44694 +15.2%

Passmark

GTX 780 Ti 9224 +17.3%
GTX 1650 7864

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
322 Mh/s
 
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

17.3% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (2880 vs 896)
Higher memory bandwidth (336 vs 128 GB/s)
SLIOptions
Purevideo
3D Vision
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
GPU Boost 2.0 (increases NVIDIA GPU voltage and frequency when there's a temperature headroom. Similar to AMD PowerTune)
GeForce Experience (software suite built to manage NVIDIA GPU parameters, and to record and stream game video)
Adaptive VSync
TXAA
G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)
SHIELD-ready
FXAA
NVIDIA Surround
SLI-ready
BluRay3D
3DGaming
3D Vision Surround
3DVisionLive
HDMI
HDCP

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Much newer (23 April 2019 vs 7 November 2013)
Cheaper ($149 vs $699)
Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (75 vs 250 watts)

So, GTX 780 Ti or 1650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX 1650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX 780 Ti or GeForce GTX 1650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
AliExpress WW