ATI Radeon X1650 PRO vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 780 6 GB GTX 780 Ti GTX 780 Ti 6 GB GTX TITAN BLACK GTX TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon X1300 XT Radeon X1600 PRO Radeon X1600 PRO AGP Radeon X1600 XT Radeon X1650 AGP Radeon X1650 PRO

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon X1650 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
10.77
+4795%

GTX 780 Rev. 2 outperforms ATI X1650 PRO by a whopping 4795% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
ATI X1650 PRO X1650 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4291375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.30no data
Power efficiency2.950.34
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BRV530
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed863 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate173.22.400
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs1924

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.77 0.22
Recency 10 September 2013 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 44 Watt

GTX 780 Rev. 2 has a 4795.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 PRO, on the other hand, has 468.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1650 PRO in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
Radeon X1650 PRO
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
ATI X1650 PRO Radeon X1650 PRO
vs
ATI X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1600 PRO Radeon X1600 PRO
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 2400 XT Radeon HD 2400 XT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1950 CrossFire Edition Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X1900 CrossFire Edition Radeon X1900 CrossFire Edition
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X850 XT Radeon X850 XT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9600 PRO Radeon 9600 PRO
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI 9800 PRO Radeon 9800 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.