ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 vs GeForce GTX 775M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
760A 760M 765M 765M SLI 770M 770M SLI 775M 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 780M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3400 3410 3430 3450 3470 3470 Hybrid X2 3650 3670 3850 3850 X2 3870 3870 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M and Mobility Radeon HD 3850, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
9.42
+1285%

775M outperforms Mobility HD 3850 by a whopping 1285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 775M GTX 775M
ATI Mobility HD 3850 Mobility HD 3850

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5031237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.251.50
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameN13E-GTX-A2M88
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2013 (12 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344320
Core clock speed719 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data9.280
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
Valorant 90−95
+217%
27−30
−217%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+620%
20−22
−620%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 65−70
+475%
12−14
−475%
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Valorant 90−95
+217%
27−30
−217%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Dota 2 65−70
+475%
12−14
−475%
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+325%
8−9
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Valorant 90−95
+217%
27−30
−217%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+1325%
4−5
−1325%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+600%
7−8
−600%
Valorant 100−110
+1414%
7−8
−1414%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 50−55
+1567%
3−4
−1567%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 775M is 2333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 775M surpassed ATI Mobility HD 3850 in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.42 0.68
Recency 24 September 2013 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 775M has a 1285% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 3850, on the other hand, has 186% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arc)
ATI Mobility HD 3850 Mobility Radeon HD 3850
vs
GT 520M GeForce GT 520M
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GTX 680M NVIDIA GTX 680M
vs
Radeon 890M 890M
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
GTX 770M GeForce GTX 770M
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
GT 640M 640M
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
GT 520M 520M
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3850 X2 3850 X2
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
GTX 780 6 GB GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GTX 775M GeForce GTX 775M
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
9400 GT Rev. 3 9400 GT Rev. 3
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
HD 7650A 7650A
GTX 775M NVIDIA GTX 775M
vs
Radeon E6760 E6760

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M or Mobility Radeon HD 3850, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.