GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 3850 and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 3850
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.68

775M Mac Edition outperforms Mobility HD 3850 by a whopping 351% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1234809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.492.36
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM88GK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (17 years ago)8 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201344
Core clock speed580 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors666 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate9.28089.26
Floating-point processing power0.3712 TFLOPS2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs16112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Valorant 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Valorant 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Valorant 27−30
−348%
130−140
+348%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Valorant 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 3.07
Recency 4 June 2008 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3850 has 185.7% lower power consumption.

GTX 775M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 351.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3850 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 32 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3850 or GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.