GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs GTX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
7.26

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms GTX 770M by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking539200
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.4676.05
Power efficiency6.6827.33
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK106GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$189.99 $179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 1605% better value for money than GTX 770M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602304
Core clock speed811 MHz1042 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate63.76105.8
Floating-point processing power1.53 TFLOPS6.774 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs8072
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB6 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width192 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI++
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M 7.26
RTX 3050 6 GB 27.73
+282%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 770M 2799
RTX 3050 6 GB 10687
+282%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−267%
180−190
+267%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.880.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−275%
180−190
+275%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−275%
180−190
+275%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−275%
180−190
+275%
Hitman 3 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−264%
80−85
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−275%
75−80
+275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−265%
95−100
+265%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Hitman 3 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−243%
24−27
+243%

This is how GTX 770M and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 267% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.26 27.73
Recency 30 May 2013 2 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 3050 6 GB has a 282% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 126 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1134 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.