GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.92
+541%

770M SLI outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430932
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Power efficiency6.413.06
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)18 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192096
Core clock speed811 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.2 GT/s
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data16
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+610%
10−11
−610%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+563%
27−30
−563%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Dota 2 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+567%
6−7
−567%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+586%
7−8
−586%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+600%
8−9
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+575%
4−5
−575%
Dota 2 85−90
+608%
12−14
−608%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+600%
6−7
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+575%
8−9
−575%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+580%
5−6
−580%
Valorant 110−120
+594%
16−18
−594%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+640%
10−11
−640%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+586%
14−16
−586%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+600%
16−18
−600%
Valorant 130−140
+543%
21−24
−543%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Valorant 65−70
+590%
10−11
−590%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 45−50
+557%
7−8
−557%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.92 1.86
Recency 30 May 2013 18 June 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 49 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 540.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 206.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6981 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or GeForce GT 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.