GeForce GT 630 vs GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with GeForce GT 630, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
12.21
+627%

GTX 770M SLI outperforms GT 630 by a whopping 627% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396930
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiency5.871.86
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192096
Core clock speed811 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.96
Floating-point processing powerno data0.311 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Valorant 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Dota 2 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Fortnite 70−75
+630%
10−11
−630%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+692%
12−14
−692%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Valorant 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
World of Tanks 170−180
+724%
21−24
−724%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+633%
3−4
−633%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Dota 2 45−50
+667%
6−7
−667%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+717%
6−7
−717%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+643%
7−8
−643%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+692%
12−14
−692%
Valorant 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+717%
12−14
−717%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
World of Tanks 90−95
+650%
12−14
−650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Valorant 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+640%
5−6
−640%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Fortnite 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.21 1.68
Recency 30 May 2013 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 626.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 630, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GeForce GT 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2817 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.