GeForce GT 630 vs GTX 770M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 770M SLI with GeForce GT 630, including specs and performance data.

GTX 770M SLI
2013
2x 3 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.41
+723%

GTX 770M SLI outperforms GT 630 by a whopping 723% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking343893
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192096
Core clock speed811 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.96
Floating-point performanceno data0.311 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+840%
5−6
−840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+840%
10−11
−840%
Hitman 3 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+840%
5−6
−840%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+744%
9−10
−744%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+840%
5−6
−840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+840%
10−11
−840%
Hitman 3 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+880%
5−6
−880%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+840%
5−6
−840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+744%
9−10
−744%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+840%
10−11
−840%
Hitman 3 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+840%
5−6
−840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+775%
4−5
−775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+744%
9−10
−744%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+900%
4−5
−900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Hitman 3 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+790%
10−11
−790%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Hitman 3 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+788%
8−9
−788%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.41 1.75
Recency 30 May 2013 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 770M SLI has a 723.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 630, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 770M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI
GeForce GTX 770M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
GeForce GT 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2594 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.