Riva 128 PCI vs GeForce GTX 760A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking745not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.00no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK106NV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed628 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate42.050.1
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs641

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 4 Watt

GTX 760A has an age advantage of 16 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 1275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook card while Riva 128 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIA Riva 128 PCI
Riva 128 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.