Riva 128 PCI vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking496not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.73no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameno dataNV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 April 1997 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed850 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.1
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GB4 MB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX115.0
OpenGLno data1.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2013 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 4 Watt

GTX 765M SLI has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128 PCI, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Riva 128 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Riva 128 PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Riva 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Riva 128 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.