GeForce2 Go 100 vs GeForce GTX 760A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking742not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.00no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGK106NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)6 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed628 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate42.050.5
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2014 6 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 760A has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 100, on the other hand, has 2650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce2 Go 100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.