GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition vs GTX 760A

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.18
+47.2%

GTX 760A outperforms GT 755M Mac Edition by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking747861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.033.01
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK106GK107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed628 MHz1085 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0534.72
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS0.8333 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA3.03.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.18 2.16
Recency 17 March 2014 8 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 760A has a 47.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 755M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 10% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760A is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.