FirePro D500 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM with FirePro D500, including specs and performance data.
GTX 760 Ti OEM outperforms FirePro D500 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 371 | 423 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 (10 years ago) | 18 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 4,313 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 109.8 | 69.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2.634 gflops | 2.227 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 279 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 243.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.07 | 10.75 |
| Recency | 27 September 2013 | 18 January 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 274 Watt |
GTX 760 Ti OEM has a 30.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 61.2% lower power consumption.
FirePro D500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is a desktop card while FirePro D500 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
