GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs GTX 750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking489not rated
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.36no data
Power efficiency10.92no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM107GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years ago)23 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed1020 MHz576 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt182 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.7236.86
Floating-point processing power1.111 TFLOPS0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs1628
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s999 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 February 2014 23 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 182 Watt

GTX 750 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 230.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2292 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.