750 vs 295

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 295
3.07

750 outperforms 295 by 182% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking720457
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Value for money0.150.82
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameGT200BGM107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years old)18 February 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 $119
Current price$200 (0.4x MSRP)$340 (2.9x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 750 has 447% better value for money than GTX 295.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240512
CUDA cores480512
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1085 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °C95 °C
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec34.72
Floating-point performance2x 596.2 gflops1,111 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors6-pin & 8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB4 GB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s80 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMIOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support+3 displays
HDMI++
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 295 3.07
GTX 750 8.67
+182%

750 outperforms 295 by 182% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 295 1190
GTX 750 3360
+182%

750 outperforms 295 by 182% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.07 8.67
Recency 8 January 2009 18 February 2014
Cost $500 $119
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 55 Watt

The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 295 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 76 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1986 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.