Radeon 780M vs GeForce GTX 690

Place in performance ranking	333	284
Place by popularity	not in top-100	85
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.96	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	GK104	Phoenix
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	3 May 2012 (12 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$411 (0.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	768
CUDA cores	3072	no data
Core clock speed	915 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1019 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	234 billion/sec	139.2
Floating-point performance	2x 3,130 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	11.0" (27.9 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 8-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5	System Shared
Memory bus width	512-bit (256-bit per GPU)	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	384 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
HDMI	Yes (via dongle)	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision Live	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 690 14.44

Radeon 780M 18.35
+27.1%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce GTX 690 by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 690 5590

Radeon 780M 7104
+27.1%

Radeon 780M outperforms GeForce GTX 690 by 27% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 690 13160
+67.3%

Radeon 780M 7865

GeForce GTX 690 outperforms Radeon 780M by 67% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −37%	37 +37%
1440p	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
4K	9−10 −33.3%	12 +33.3%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.44	18.35
Recency	3 May 2012	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5	System Shared
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	54 Watt