Radeon Pro 5700 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	187	177
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.60	16.39
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2304
Core clock speed	1215 MHz	1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.1	194.4
Floating-point processing power	6.82 TFLOPS	6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.4 GB/s	384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4200 Max-Q 29.66

Pro 5700 30.69
+3.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4200 Max-Q 11446

Pro 5700 11844
+3.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	29.66	30.69
Recency	21 February 2018	4 August 2020
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	130 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has 30% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700, on the other hand, has a 3.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P4200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5700.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.