GeForce GTX 675MX vs GTX 680MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 675MX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 680MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
10.74
+52.3%

GTX 680MX outperforms GTX 675MX by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking427552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.044.84
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536960
Core clock speed720 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3540 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate92.2 billion/sec52.32
Floating-point processing powerno data1.256 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision+-
Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 API
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 680MX 10.74
+52.3%
GTX 675MX 7.05

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
    • GeekBench 5 CUDA
    • Octane Render OctaneBench

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680MX 4138
+52.4%
GTX 675MX 2716

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 680MX 6736
+69.3%
GTX 675MX 3979

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 680MX 25501
+34.6%
GTX 675MX 18950

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 680MX 12227
+13.7%
GTX 675MX 10758

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 680MX 11307
+59.6%
GTX 675MX 7085

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 680MX 36
+9.1%
GTX 675MX 33

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+24.5%
49
−24.5%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+70%
20−22
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+41.5%
40−45
−41.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+70%
20−22
−70%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+41.5%
40−45
−41.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+41.5%
40−45
−41.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+22.6%
50−55
−22.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+54.5%
40−45
−54.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how GTX 680MX and GTX 675MX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is 24% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 680MX is 300% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675MX is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 680MX is ahead in 70 tests (97%)
  • GTX 675MX is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.74 7.05
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 680MX has a 52.3% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 675MX, on the other hand, has 22% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 680MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.