GeForce GTX 675MX vs GTX 670MX SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and GeForce GTX 675MX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 670MX SLI
2012
150 Watt
8.52
+37.4%

GTX 670MX SLI outperforms GTX 675MX by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking470561
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.514.92
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN13E-GRGK104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920960
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors5080 Million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.32
Floating-point processing powerno data1.256 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 API
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 670MX SLI 8.52
+37.4%
GTX 675MX 6.20

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • Unigine Heaven 3.0

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 670MX SLI 7042
+77%
GTX 675MX 3979

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 670MX SLI 23526
+24.2%
GTX 675MX 18950

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 670MX SLI 66
+61.6%
GTX 675MX 41

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+42%
50
−42%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Fortnite 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Valorant 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+48.5%
30−35
−48.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 168
+28.2%
131
−28.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Dota 2 65−70
+26.4%
50−55
−26.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Fortnite 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Valorant 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Dota 2 65−70
+26.4%
50−55
−26.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Valorant 90−95
+23.3%
70−75
−23.3%
Fortnite 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+36.5%
50−55
−36.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%
Valorant 100−110
+35.5%
75−80
−35.5%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Fortnite 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Valorant 45−50
+41.2%
30−35
−41.2%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Fortnite 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and GTX 675MX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX SLI is 42% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 670MX SLI surpassed GTX 675MX in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.52 6.20
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 670MX SLI has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 675MX, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675MX in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7
3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670MX SLI or GeForce GTX 675MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.