RTX A400 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with RTX A400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.79
+8.5%

GTX 675M SLI outperforms RTX A400 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking480510
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed620 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.29
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%
Hitman 3 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+18%
50−55
−18%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.79 8.10
Recency 6 January 2011 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has a 8.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 2400% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 675M SLI and RTX A400.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.