GeForce GT 710 vs GTX 670MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX with GeForce GT 710, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670MX
2012
3 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
5.01
+215%

GTX 670MX outperforms GT 710 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking632964
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiency4.695.88
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK104GK208
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$34.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960192
Core clock speed600 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt19 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate48.0815.26
Floating-point processing power1.154 TFLOPS0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Heightno data2.713" (6.9 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data3 displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision-+
PureVideo-+
PhysX-+
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 670MX 5.01
+215%
GT 710 1.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 670MX 1973
+216%
GT 710 625

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 670MX 2371
+150%
GT 710 947

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 670MX 6046
+211%
GT 710 1947

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 670MX 5316
+172%
GT 710 1953

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 670MX 18
+200%
GT 710 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+400%
8
−400%
1440p9−10
+200%
3
−200%
4K21−24
+200%
7
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.37
1440pno data11.66
4Kno data5.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5
−180%
Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+100%
5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Valorant 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 96
+191%
30−35
−191%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 40−45
+105%
20
−105%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+250%
4
−250%
Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+200%
3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+160%
5
−160%
Valorant 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 40−45
+128%
18
−128%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+250%
4
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+333%
3
−333%
Valorant 60−65
+66.7%
35−40
−66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Valorant 50−55
+489%
9−10
−489%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+129%
7
−129%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how GTX 670MX and GT 710 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 670MX is 400% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 670MX is 200% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 670MX is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 670MX is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 670MX surpassed GT 710 in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 1.59
Recency 1 October 2012 27 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 19 Watt

GTX 670MX has a 215.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GT 710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 294.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 670MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GeForce GT 710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 52 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 4410 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670MX or GeForce GT 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.