Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
GTX 775M Mac Edition vs GT 710
Combined performance score
GTX 775M Mac Edition outperforms GT 710 by 106% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 902 | 694 |
Place by popularity | 52 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.04 | 0.25 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | GK208B | GK104 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 March 2014 (10 years old) | 8 November 2013 (10 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | no data |
Current price | $81 (2.3x MSRP) | $149 |
GTX 775M Mac Edition has 525% better value for money than GT 710.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 1344 |
CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 797 MHz |
Number of transistors | 915 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 100 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 | 89.26 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 2,142 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | no data |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | MXM Module |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | 3 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision | + | no data |
PureVideo | + | no data |
PhysX | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
−100%
| 16−18
+100%
|
1440p | 3
−100%
| 6−7
+100%
|
4K | 7
−100%
| 14−16
+100%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−80%
|
18−20
+80%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 5
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−80%
|
18−20
+80%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Metro Exodus | 3
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−100%
|
16−18
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
This is how GT 710 and GTX 775M Mac Edition compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- GTX 775M Mac Edition is 100% faster than GT 710
1440p resolution:
- GTX 775M Mac Edition is 100% faster than GT 710
4K resolution:
- GTX 775M Mac Edition is 100% faster than GT 710
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.63 | 3.36 |
Recency | 27 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 100 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 710 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.